- The Supreme Court docket, on June 19, 2020, had quashed a presidential reference filed in opposition to Justice Qazi Faez Isa.
- Justice Isa has sought removing of paragraphs 2 to 11 of the decision.
- He has been allowed to argue his case himself; court docket to resolve on request for dwell broadcast of proceedings.
ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court docket on Tuesday allowed Justice Qazi Faez Isa to argue his case relating to a evaluation petition in opposition to the June 19, 2020 order.
A ten-member SC bigger bench comprising Justice Umar Ata Bandial, Justice Maqbool Baqar, Justice Manzoor Ahmed Malik, Justice Mazhar Alam Khan Miankhel, Justice Sajjad Ali Shah, Justice Syed Mansoor Ali Shah, Justice Munib Akhtar, Justice Yahya Afridi, Justice Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed and Justice Aminuddin Khan heard the evaluation petition looking for removing of paragraphs 2 to 11 of the June 19, 2020 verdict.
The apex court docket, on June 19, 2020, had quashed a presidential reference filed in opposition to SC decide Justice Qazi Faez Isa.
Through the course of proceedings, the court docket allowed Justice Isa to argue his case after receiving a written utility by his counsel Muneer A Malik relating to his incapability to argue the case because of sickness.
Justice Qazi Faez Isa mentioned that though there is no such thing as a point out of the dwell broadcast of parliamentary proceedings within the Structure, he requests that PTV cowl it dwell.
He argued that freedom of expression is a fundamental human proper and requested why the court docket is not utilizing the know-how whether it is accessible.
Justice Qazi Faez Isa — a short profile
Justice Bandial mentioned that there have been logistic and sensible issues in regards to the dwell telecast of court docket proceedings.
It’s a coverage and administrative matter, quite than a judicial one, he added.
The decide mentioned that the total court docket would evaluation whether or not the dwell broadcast might be allowed or not.
If the court docket agreed to direct protection, the state equipment could be used, the decide added.
Justice Bandial mentioned that no non-public digicam could be allowed within the court docket and referred to as for the presence of journalists in court docket quite than “capitalists”.
When requested who would signify the federal authorities Extra Lawyer Common Aamir Rehman mentioned that he simply acquired directions to obtain discover.
Justice Mansoor Ali Shah mentioned that surprisingly, it had not been determined but who would signify the federal authorities within the case.
The listening to of the case was adjourned till tomorrow (Wednesday).